Deepak Kumar @ Ankit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.569 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-496 Year-2020 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

DEEPAK KUMAR @ ANKIT KUMAR Son of Arvind Gope Resident of Village- Bhattana Bigha, P.S. Chandi, District- Nalanda. 2.

BABLU KUMAR @ BULLU KUMAR Son of Arvind Gope Resident of Village- Bhattana Bigha, P.S. Chandi, District- Nalanda. 3.

RAJA RAM GOPE @ RAJA RAM KUMAR Son of Krishna Gope Resident of Village- Bhattana Bigha, P.S. Chandi, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to make rectification in Para-1 of the anticipatory bail application. Permission is accorded.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that on account of previous dispute, the present occurrence took place in which all the accused persons, including the petitioners, came to the house of the informant and it is alleged that Arbind

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.569 of 2022(2) dt.03-08-2022 2/2 Gope fired causing injury on the left hand of the informant and thereafter all the accused persons assaulted. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the specific allegation of firing is against Arbind Gope and as far as other accused persons, including the petitioners, are concerned, the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 496 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T