Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77996 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2018 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna ====================================================== Ravi Kumar, Son of Binda Mahto, Resident of Village- Shivchak Mall, P.S.- New Bypass District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Special Case No. 10030 of 2018 arising out of Bypass P.S. Case No. 333 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 100 litres of country made Mahua wine and 1.2 litres in pouch of Mahua wine prepared in the house of co-accused Gorush Mahto. Allegation against petitioner and other co-accused is of being present there. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 20.10.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77996 of 2018(2) dt.07-01-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 10030 of 2018 arising out of Bypass P.S. Case No. 333 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T