Patna High CourtCR. MISC./428/2019partly allowed disposal

Shailesh Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-04Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.428 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2017 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ======================================================

1. Shailesh Paswan Son of Late Tetar Paswan Resident of Village-Ghajna, P.SGoh, District-Aurangabad

2. Jairam Paswan Son of Late Tetar Paswan Resident of Village-Ghajna, P.SGoh, District-Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

This is an application for grant of regular bail filed on behalf of the petitioners. Petitioners are in custody in connection with Goh PS Case No. 84 of 2017 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 304, 341, 323, 448, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the fact that petitioner no. 1 has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 05.10.2018, the Court is inclined to grant him bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner no.1 above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.428 of 2019(2) dt.04-02-2019 2/2 Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with Goh PS Case No. 84 of 2017.

In so far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, he was accused in one case bearing Goh PS Case No. 67 of 2017. Considering the fact that petitioner no.2 has some criminal antecedent, prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.2 is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail if the trial of the instant case is not completed within a period of six months from today.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mrl./- U T