Amir Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77637 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-574 Year-2018 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Amir Alam S/o Badruddin @ Jham Lal, R/o Dohabari, P.S.- Goalpokhar, District- Uttardinajpur, West Bengal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar -2 (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 574 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 401, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner was arrested by the informant, who is police officer, from whose possession stolen motorcycle was recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.09.2018. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77637 of 2018(2) dt.02-01-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 574 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T