Radhe Shyam @ Radhe Shyam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72832 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2022 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RADHE SHYAM @ RADHE SHYAM YADAV Son of Ram Swarth Yadav R/V- Tetua Bidarpar, P.S- Atri, Dist- Gaya 2.

Tuntun Kumar Son of Basudeo Yadav R/V- Tetua Bidarpar, P.S- Atri, DistGaya 3.

Rohit Kumar Son of Baijnath Yadav R/V- Tetua Bidarpar, P.S- Atri, DistGaya 4.

Upendra Yadav @ Upendra Prasad Yadav @ Upendra Prasad Son of Ram Swarth Yadav R/V- Tetua Bidarpar, P.S- Atri, Dist- Gaya 5.

Ranjay Yadav Son of Ram Swarth Yadav R/V- Tetua Bidarpar, P.S- Atri, Dist- Gaya 6.

Chunchun Kumar Son of Basudeo yadav R/V- Tetua Bidarpar, P.S- Atri, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 354, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72832 of 2022(4) dt.20-03-2023 2/2 case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He submits that there is admitted land dispute between the parties. He further submits that the injuries found upon the victim are simple in nature as mentioned in annexure-3 series of the bail application. He further submits that petitioners have got one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the injuries found upon the victim are simple in nature, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Atri P.S. Case No.212 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T