← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3492/2019disposed

Ravindra Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-19Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3492 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12766 of 2017 ====================================================== Ravindra Prasad Singh Son of Late Mishri Singh Resident of Village- Sare, P.S. and P.O.- Sare, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Revenue and Reforms Department Sri Brajesh Mehrotra, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Divisional Commissioner Sri Anand Kishore, Patna Divisiona, Patna 3.

The Collector cum District Magistrate Sri Yogendra Singh, District Nalanda 4.

The Superintendent of Police Sri NIlesh Kumar, Nalanda at Biharsharif, District Nalanda 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer Sri Sudhir Kumar, Biharsharif, Nalanda 6.

The Anchal Adhikari Sri Sunil Kumar Asthawan, P.S. Asthawan, DistrictNalanda 7.

The Station House Officer Sri Dinesh Prsad, Sare Police Station, District Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc 19) Mr.Saurabh Kumar, Ac to Sc 19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 19-06-2023 None appears for the petitioner.

2. Petitioner has presented the present MJC for noncompliance of the order dated 27.11.2017 passed in CWJC No. 12766 of 2017. During pendency of the present MJC, official respondents have taken necessary steps in registering Encroachment Case No. 5 of 2017-2018 decided on 22.11.2022.

Patna High Court MJC No.3492 of 2019(4) dt.19-06-2023 2/2

3. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 22.11.2022, the concerned party has invoked remedy of appeal before the appellate authority and appeal case no. 01 of 2023 is pending consideration before the Appellate Authority.

4. In the light of these developments, the present contempt petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the present contempt proceeding of the present MJC No. 3492 of 2019 stands dropped reserving liberty to the respective parties to expedite Appeal Case No. 01 of 2023. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Jitendra Kumar, J) abhishekkr/- U