Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6372/2017rejected

Laltu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-04Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6372 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -367 Year- 2016 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Laltu Kumar, Son of Aditya Yadav, Resident of Madhepura, Ward no. 08, Nagar Parishad Madhpra, P.S. and District-Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2017 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 367 of 2016, registered under Sections 323, 341, 365, 307, 379 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura.

The accusation is that six persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner, along with 15 to 20 unknown forcibly carried to informant, namely, Kundan Kumar and started assaulting to him and thereafter they brought the informant at the house of Vishal Kumar Bablu, where they kept the informant for half and hour. Thereafter, the informant was taken in the forest

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6372 of 2017 (2) dt.04-04-2017 2/2 near the bank of river, where he was assaulted by the butt of the pistol and cash of Rs. 5000/- as well as golden chain has also been snatched by co-accused Chandan Kumar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case mere on suspicion.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trail Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T