Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60839/2025dismissed

Ajay Kumar @ Satyendra Turha v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60839 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajay Kumar @ Satyendra Turha S/o Late Jagdish Prasad R/o Village - Sheopuri Naga Road Raxaul, P.S - Raxaul, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP.

For the Union of India :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned APP for the State and Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 22(b), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act.

3. Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel, who is present in the Court, and appears on behalf of the Union of India, was requested by this Court, to peruse the F.I.R. and he informs that the petitioner don't deserve to be released on prearrest bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60839 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2

4. Considering the nature of allegation made in the F.I.R., as well as, the fact that the petitioner's name has surfaced in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of the apprehended co-accused, namely, Ravi Kumar Gupta, and from the house of the father-in-law of the co-accused Ravi Kumar Gupta, recovery of prohibited medicine was made and the quantity of the seized prohibited medicine was more than that of the permissible limit, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on pre-arrest bail.

5. The petitioner, if so advised, may seek regular bail before the learned District Court. The learned District Court is directed to pass a necessary order, in accordance with law, on the basis of materials available on record, on the same day, the bail application is filed, without any further delay and without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court.

6. Accordingly, the present bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T