Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60191/2022bail rejected

Akhtar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-24Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60191 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2022 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== AKHTAR Son of Late Rahman Resident of Egachiya Digghi Tola, P.SAmour, Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 148, 149, 307, 379, 324, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence took place wherein it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant by sword causing injury on head.

Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant also alleges that other accused persons also assaulted by lathi and danda and it might be a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60191 of 2022(4) dt.24-06-2023 2/2 possibility that the injuries suffered by the injured was on account of assault by lathi and danda and not by sword. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the wound is a cut injury on the temporal region of the informant and the injury has been said to be grievous.

Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T