Satendra Tiwari @ Dhori Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61284 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2025 Thana- MALAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Satendra Tiwari @ Dhori Tiwari son of Shiv Tiwari Resident of village - Barwaliya Tiwari Tola, Ps- Malahi, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2025 Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned APP for the State. 2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Malahi P.S. Case No. 96 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The informant alleged that on 17.03.2025, while returning home, he was intercepted by three unknown miscreants. They looted Rs. 64,540/- and his mobile phone. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28-05-2025. Petitioner bears three criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61284 of 2025(2) dt.11-09-2025 2/3 counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Jagdish Sahani. Petitioner is remanded in this case from Malahi PS Case No. 248 of 2023. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner was not even put on T.I.P. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, manner of petitioner's implication and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Malahi P.S. Case No. 96 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61284 of 2025(2) dt.11-09-2025 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T