Anita Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20661 of 2012 ====================================================== Anita Devi Wife of Chandradeo Yadav Resident of Village - Amarbigha, Anchal - Bodh Gaya, P.S. - Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate, Gaya, District - Gaya Bihar 3.
The Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya Bihar 4.
The District Welfare Officer, Gaya, District - Gaya Bihar 5.
The District Programme Officer, Gaya , District - Gaya Bihar 6.
The Child Development Project Officer, Block - Bodh Gaya , District - Gaya Bihar 7.
The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Dhanawa, Block - Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya Bihar 8.
The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Dhanwara, Block - Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya Bihar 9.
Kavita Devi Wife Of Sri Binod Singh Prabhakar Resident of Village - Sondhi, Anchal - Manpur, P.S. - Gaya Muffassil, District - Gaya Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raju Giri, Advocate.
For the State :
Mr. Mujtabaul Haque, GP-12.
For respondent no.9 :
Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-06-2024 Heard Mr. Raju Giri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Mujtabaul Haque, learned GP-12 for the State and Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, learned counsel for the respondent no.9.
2. Learned counsel for the State informs that the selection of Anganbari Sevika relates to the year 2012 and already selection of respondent no.9 Kavita Devi has taken
Patna High Court CWJC No.20661 of 2012(3) dt.20-06-2024 2/2 place and she is working as Anganbari Sevika. Hence, the petitioner don't have any locus once her case was rejected considering her eligibility criteria having not been fulfilled by her.
3. Considering the aforesaid information, I don't find to interfere in any manner. The writ petition, accordingly, stands dismissed.
(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U