Dr. Satya Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3185 of 2014 =========================================================== Dr. Satya Narayan Yadav, Son of Late Mosafir Yadav, Resident of Village Poari, P.S. Bisfi, District Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director, Secondary Education, Secretariat, Patna

2. The District Education Officer, Darbhanga

3. The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga

4. The Principal, Lohia Charan Singh College, Darbhanga

5. Ram Bharose Yadav, S/o not known, working as a teacher in L.C.S. College, Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Madhubala Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, G.P-18 For the University : Ajay Behari Sinha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State as well as University.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has earlier filed representation on 14.08.2012, which is still pending before the ViceChancellor of the University, but for convenience he may be granted liberty to file fresh representation enclosing all the relevant documents so that the Vice-Chancellor may take appropriate decision on the representation.

3. Considering the fact that the issue involved is scrutiny of fact and the University is in a better position to appreciate

Patna High Court CWJC No.3185 of 2014 dt.20-08-2018 2/2 the fact, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the Vice-Chancellor of the University enclosing the order of this Court. In case, the petitioner files representation, the Vice-Chancellor is required to decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation by a reasoned and speaking order.

4. With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 24.08.2018 Transmission Date