Shyam Sundar Kumar @ Shyam Sundar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65210 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Shyam Sundar Kumar @ Shyam Sundar Thakur, S/o Chandeshwar Thakur Resident of Village- Jhauaram, P.S- Dhaka, District- East Champaran (Motihari) 2.

Shyamnandan Thakur @ Shyamnandan S/o Chandeshwar Thakur Resident of Village- Jhauaram, P.S- Dhaka, District- East Champaran (Motihari) 3.

Shyam Babu Kumar @ Shyam Babu S/o Chandeshwar Thakur Resident of Village- Jhauaram, P.S- Dhaka, District- East Champaran (Motihari) 4.

Chandeshwar Thakur S/o Late Saryug Thakur Resident of VillageJhauaram, P.S- Dhaka, District- East Champaran (Motihari) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Anjali, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-10-2024 Heard Ms. Kumari Anjali, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 181 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 354, 341, 307, 323, 324, 504, 379 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the petitioners along with other accused persons assaulted the informant and his wife with an intention to kill causing injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65210 of 2024(2) dt.05-10-2024 2/3 on different parts of the body.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the injury sustained by the victims are simple in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. For trivial dispute, the petitioners have been roped in the present case. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioners and the fact that the injuries sustained by the victims are simple in nature, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dhaka in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 181 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65210 of 2024(2) dt.05-10-2024 3/3 force.

8. The bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T