Poonam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.2191 of 2015 (2) dt.04-02-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2191 of 2015 ====================================================== Poonam Kumari, wife of Sri Arjun Singh, resident of village-Basundhara, P.S.-Kargahar in the district of Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, I.C.D.S., Indira Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Rohtas.

5. The District ProgrammeOfficer, Rohtas

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Kargahar, Rohtas

7. The Gram Panchayat, Thorsan through its Secretary.

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Thorsan in the district of Rohtas

9. Anita Kumari, wife of Jayendra Singh, resident of village Basundhara, P.S. Kargahar in the district of Rohtas .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gp32- Harish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 The Court is not inclined to interfere with the writ application at this stage, because there are enough provisions already made by the State in the guidelines and policy with regard to the selection and non-selection of Anganbari Sevika. Since the petitioner has not exhausted that remedy by moving competent authority or the appellate authority, if need be, she can do so even now.

The writ application is disposed of with liberty as above. B.Roy/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) U