Patna High CourtCWJC/667/2015disposed

Yogendra Prasad @ Yogendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-12Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.667 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Yogendra Prasad @ Yogendra Thakur Son of Late Ramlochan Thakur Resident of Village-Harpur, Tola: Bathna, P.O.-Birwa, P.S.-Majhaulia, District-West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah.

4. Sub. Division Officer, Bettiah, District-West Champaran.

5. Circle Officer, Majhaulia Anchal, District-West Champaran.

6. Circle Inspector, Majhaulia Anchal, District-West Champaran.

7. Halka Karamchari, Mauza: Harpur, Majhaulia Anchal, District-West Champaran.

8. Mangani Ram Son of-Bishuni Ram

9. Rajendra Ram Son of-Bishuni Ram

10. Pujan Ram Son of-Buni Lal Ram All Sl. No.8 to 10 are resident of-Harpur, Tola, Bathna, P.O.-Birwa, P.S.-Majhaulia, District-West Champaran. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh For the Respondents : Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC27 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-02-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner has claimed purchase of 03 decimals of land from the agnate of Satyanarayan Pandey in July, 2010. By enclosing the purcha ( Annexure-2) issued in favour of the private respondents on 29.06.2010, it has been submitted that the same is illegal. Although it has been stated in the writ petition that a proceeding under the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947 ( for short 'the Act') was initiated but no order passed

Patna High Court CWJC No.667 of 2015 dt.12-02-2015 2/2 therein has been placed on record. The grievance of the petitioner, in my view, can very well be raised and considered by the Collector Under Section 21 of the Act. I am sure, if any such application is filed by the petitioner, within a reasonable period of time the respondentCollector -cum- District Magistrate shall examine the same and dispose of in accordance with law.

The writ application is disposed of.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U