← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60818/2022bail granted

Gajendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-26Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60818 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2022 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Gajendra Kumar S/o Ram Chhapit Yadav R/o Village- Abhaypura, P.S.- Sandesh in the Distt of Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 26-11-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 317 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 25.04.2022.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60818 of 2022(2) dt.26-11-2022 2/3 The allegation against the petitioner is to be involved in illegal trading of illicit liquor, where 15.660 liters of foreign liquor was recovered.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was made from the rented room, which was occupied by several other persons and, as such, it can be safely gathered that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that seizure list appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses rather by police personnel. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation in this case is complete for which chargesheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer of bail.

In view of the facts and circumstances, as mentioned above, as recovery of illicit liquor not appears to be made from conscious physical possession of the petitioner coupled with the fact that chargesheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 317 of 2022 on furnishing bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60818 of 2022(2) dt.26-11-2022 3/3 bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1, Bhojpur, Ara/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Ankit/- U T