Md. Idrish Ansari @ Idrish Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65850 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-511 Year-2022 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== MD. IDRISH ANSARI @ IDRISH ANSARI Son of Late M. Jalil Ansari @ Late Jalil Ansari R/V- Bidaidih, P.S- Banka, Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Pinky Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is her maiden appearance and any mistake committed during the course of argument may be condoned off by the sweet temper of the Hon'ble Chair.

The informant alleges that at dargah, one Md. Tasim slapped his brother, on protest accused persons assaulted, further petitioner assaulted by lathi causing injury on head of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65850 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 2/3 petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a senior citizen aged about 69 years and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that Banka P.S. Case No. 510 of 2022 was instituted by the petitioner against the informant and his side in which it is alleged that petitioner was assaulted, it is also submitted that petitioner is a senior citizen and he was assaulted and thereafter when Banka P.S. Case No. 510 of 2022 was instituted, the informant instituted the present case by way of counterblast falsely alleging that it was petitioner who assaulted him causing injury on his head. Learned counsel next submits that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting for the purposes of anticipatory bail then the injury is not grievous as the injured sustained lacerated wound on his forehead as would be evident from the order impugned. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65850 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 3/3 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 511 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T