Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.79436 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2018 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Son of Devendra Prasad Resident of Village- Sugoan P.SSugauli, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar Tondon For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Ramgarahwa P.S. Case No. 226 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 354, 354(A), 354(C), 354(D) of the Indian Penal Code and 8 POCSO Act.

Informant is the minor girl, who in her written complaint has stated that while going to coaching institute, petitioner used to tease her in the way and also used filthy language against her and used to send objectionable SMS on her mobile kept by her uncle.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79436 of 2018(3) dt.06-02-2019 2/2 he is college going student and allegations are not true. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 25.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Session Judge cum Special Judge POCSO Act, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Ramgarahwa P.S. Case No. 226 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T