← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62607/2019disposed

Doman Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62607 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2010 Thana- MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

DOMAN YADAV Son of Late Kamal Yadav Resident of Village- Malia, P.S.- Madhepura (O.P. Bharrahi), District- Madhepura. 2.

Shambhu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav @ Shambhu Yadav @ Pappu Yadav Son of Doman Yadav Resident of Village- Malia, P.S.- Madhepura (O.P. Bharrahi), District- Madhepura.

3.

Om Prakash @ Kishto Yadav Son of Doman Yadav Resident of VillageMalia, P.S.- Madhepura (O.P. Bharrahi), District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ruby Kumari D/O- Hari Nandan Sharma Resident of Vill- Malia, P.S.- Madhepura (Barrari) and District- Madhepura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2019 Petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 11 of 2010 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 368, 372, 511, 120B and 384 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per complaint case petitioners are said to have kidnapped the complainant and confined her in a room and the case is of the year 2010.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a matter of fact no summons has been issued against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62607 of 2019(3) dt.16-11-2019 2/2 them and they came to know about the case in the year 2019 and thereafter the present case has been filed and moreover the complainant has not supported the prosecution case and during inquiry by Mahila Help Line allegation was found false and thereafter the false complaint case has been filed. Heard learned APP, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In view of above facts and circumstances, this application is disposed of with direction to the petitioners to surrender and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered on the basis of above submission and also on the basis of materials available on the record and, if possible, to be disposed of on the same day.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T