← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60137/2025bail granted

Munna Michal @ Aryan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-03Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60137 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2024 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Munna Michal @ Aryan Kumar S/o- Gopal Verma Village- Sarmera PsSarmera Dist- Nalanda, A/P- Deepnagar Ps- Deepnagar Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 270 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 304 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that some unknown miscreants snatched gold chain of the informant from her neck and fled away from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60137 of 2025(2) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused, namely, Sonu Kumar and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that no looted article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has been remanded in this case on 29.10.2024 and has got five criminal antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 270 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T