Ramji Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66897 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2024 Thana- TEYAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Ramji Yadav S/o- Dharishan Yadav Village- Ps- Tiyar Dist- Bhojpur 2.

Raju Singh Son of Ramji Yadav Village- Ps- Tiyar Dist- Bhojpur 3.

Rajesh singh Son of Ramji Yadav Village- Ps- Tiyar Dist- Bhojpur 4.

Ram Ishwar Yadav @ Ram Ishwar Singh Son of Late Ramayan Yadav Village- Ps- Tiyar Dist- Bhojpur 5.

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Yadav Son of Ram Ishwar Yadav Village- Ps- Tiyar Dist- Bhojpur 6.

Krisna Kumar @ Krisna Yadav Son of Late Dudh Nath Yadav Village- PsTiyar Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramanuj Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 504, 506 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant was harvesting wheat, in the meantime, all the accused persons came there and abused him also made firing on him. Earlier, accused persons had killed informant's uncle on 16.11.1991.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66897 of 2024(2) dt.08-10-2024 2/2 there is land dispute between the parties and no such incident ever took place. Present case is counter blast of Tiyar Police Station Case No. 28/2024 lodged by the petitioner no.1 against the informant and his family members. Parties are next door neighbourers. Though there is allegation of indiscriminate firing, but no one sustained any fire arm injuries.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Tiyar Police Station Case No. 29/2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T