← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1819/2015bail granted

Fulchan Mandal @ Fulchand Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-16Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1819 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -102 Year- 2014 Thana -BARIYARPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Fulchan Mandal @ Fulchand Mandal son of Ramswarup Mandal, resident of village Saraswati Nagar Bind Toli Kali Asthan, (Bariarpur), Police Station Bariarpur, District Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that apart from suspicion there is no direct material against the Petitioner, who has fair antecedents, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Bariarpur P.S. Case No.

102 of 2014, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1819 of 2015 (2) dt.16-01-2015 2/2 the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. (Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T