← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19582/2019disposed

Sri Narmadeshwar Pathak, v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-22Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19582 of 2019 ====================================================== Sri Narmadeshwar Pathak, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Pathak, resident of Village- Barachakiya, Police Station- Chakiya, District- East Champaran, Retired Block Agriculture Officer, Motipur, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Director of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Agriculture Producation Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

District Magistrate-cum-Collector, West Champaran. 6.

District Magistrate, East Champaran.

7.

District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

8.

District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

9.

Block Development Officer, Jogipatti, West Champaran. 10.

Block Development Officer, Saraiya, Muzaffarpur. 11.

Block Development Officer, Sonbarsha, Sitamarhi. 12.

Block Development Officer, Matipur, Muzaffarpur. 13.

Additional Collector, Apda Prabandhan, Muzaffarpur. 14.

Accountant General of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mahendra Prasad Bhartee, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Raghwanand, GA-11 For the Respondent No. 11 :

Mr. Ram Kinker Chaubey, SC, IA & AD ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Though the present writ petition was filed for grant of retiral dues, however, during the interregnum period, the entire retiral dues of the petitioner have stood paid. However, the only grievance being agitated by the petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.19582 of 2019(12) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 is regarding non-grant of ACP/MACP.

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to agitate his grievance regarding non-grant of ACP/MACP and interest over the delayed payment of retiral dues before the concerned authority.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed, however, with the aforesaid liberty.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U