← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66026/2023dismissed

Chandra Shekhar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-27Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65631 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-392 Year-2023 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== ADITYA KUMAR @ ADITYA PRASAD son of Chandra Shekhar Prasad Village- Majhariya W.No-7, Ps- Shikarpur Dist- W.Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66026 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-392 Year-2023 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== CHANDRA SHEKHAR PRASAD S/O LATE TEGA PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- MAJHARIYA, WARD NO. 7, P.S- SHIKARPUR, DISTT.- WEST CHAMPARAN.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 65631 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66026 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 27-02-2024 Heard Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner in both the cases and Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta learned counsel for the informant as also the APP.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 392 of 2023 for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65631 of 2023(4) dt.27-02-2024 2/3 offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the I.P.C. lodged on 11.03.2023 by the informant, Hajari Prasad.

3. As per the prosecution story, the allegation in the FIR is that while he was busy storing the grains in the courtyard, his agnate Ragani Kumari started abusing and as the matter escalated, the accused persons armed variously came and further allegation against both the petitioners is/are of assaulting one Vikash Kumar causing injuries to him. The allegation is of use of farse and knife by the two petitioners herein.

4. As the injury report of Reshma Devi was found to be simple in nature and other injuries were not available the coordinate Bench on 18.10.2023 had called for the injury report.

5. On 08.12.2023, this Court also wanted to look into the injury report and accordingly an order was passed to provide the injury report of Vikash Kumar and Hajari Prasad (informant).

6. The same is on record and though the injury report of Hajari Prasad has been found to be simple in nature, so far as Vikash Kumar is concerned, the nature of the injury has been found to be grievous.

7. In that background, it would be appropriate that both the petitioners seek bail after surrendering before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65631 of 2023(4) dt.27-02-2024 3/3 concerned Court.

8. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

9. In view of the fact that both the petitioners were given interim protection by the coordinate Bench on 18.10.2023, in case both of them or either of two surrender before the concerned Court within a period of four weeks from today, the interim protection will continue till an order is passed. It is made clear that the interim protection has been extended only for four weeks considering that they were granted the said protection earlier on.

10. If they surrender within four weeks, the same shall be taken up and if possible be disposed of on the same day. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U T