Sunaina Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2671 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2014 Thana -MURAR District- BUXAR ====================================================== Sunaina Devi, Wife of Santosh Singh, Resident of vill+P.O Thori Pandeypur, P.S-Murar, Distt.-Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Upadhyay, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 22-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 408, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that there is no specific circular that Solar light had to be purchased only from BREDA or BELTRON and were purchased from another Company without comprising on rate and quality, let the Petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Murar P.S. Case No. 50 of 2014, G.R. No. 2751 of 2014, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2671 of 2015 (2) dt.22-01-2015 2/3 the Court concerned to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Choubey, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Buxar, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if she is, she shall not be released on bail.
(iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2671 of 2015 (2) dt.22-01-2015 3/3 present application for anticipatory bail shall not stand in its way and she should deposit the same as directed.
(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T