Ravi Ranjan Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17507 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANDRADEEP District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Ravi Ranjan Yadav, son of Rajo Yadav,

2. Chunchun Yadav, S/o Surju Yadav,

3. Sunil Yadav, S/o Chando Yadav, all are resident of Village- Khadagpur, P.S.- Chandradip, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/148/149/341/342/307/379/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners were identified as members of the mob of 26 persons, who committed assault and theft against the informant and others.

Submission of the petitioners is that the allegation is general and omnibus.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17507 of 2017 (2) dt.21-04-2017 2/2 Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Mr. N.K. Yadav, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui/Successor Court in connection with Chandradeep Police Station Case No.28 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With condition that petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the Court-below shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail-bonds of the petitioners in this case. (Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T