Subhan Gaddi @ Shubhan @ Shubham Gaddi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63474 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-745 Year-2024 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Subhan Gaddi @ Shubhan @ Shubham Gaddi S/o Bhikham Gaddi Resident of Vill- Bhogadi, Ward No.08, P.S.- Majhauliya, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in paragraph no. 4 of the present bail application during course of the day.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 340 of 2024 arising out of Manjhauliya P.S. Case No. 745 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 80/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

4. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner alongwith the family members tortured and killed the deceased for the non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63474 of 2025(3) dt.14-11-2025 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that petitioner is the husband of the deceased and the onus lies heavily upon him, and therefore, he does not deserve to be released on bail.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also petitioner being the husband of the deceased, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T