Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72128 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2021 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar Yadav, Son Of Late Giranand Yadav Resident Of Village- Garki, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mrigendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2021, he is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that there is an error in the order of the learned Court below wherein it has been recorded that petitioner was arrested in one case.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that on 01.03.2021, he along with family members had gone to his sister's house leaving the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72128 of 2021(3) dt.17-05-2022 2/3 responsibility of the house on his staff that is the petitioner. Later on, the informant was informed about a theft committed in his house. Accordingly, when the informant came back and found that Rs. Five Lacs as well as jewellery along with other articles as detailed in the F.I.R. are missing. Thus, alleges that the theft was committed by the petitioner and Bablu Kumar Mandal.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and during the course of investigation, it transpired that certain articles were recovered from the house of his sister-in-law, but the articles recovered were common household and jewellery and that is why the same was never put on T. I. Parade or else. The truth would have revealed that the articles recovered from the sister-in-law were not looted or theft articles. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, he is a person with clean antecedent, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and in the nature of allegation, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72128 of 2021(3) dt.17-05-2022 3/3 each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Jokihat P. S. Case No.91 of 2021. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T