Rohit Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.60 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2018 Thana- SC/ST District- Rohtas ======================================================

1. Rohit Kumar and Ors

2. Ranjan Kumar singh Alias Pankaj Kumar Sons of late Saheb Singh.

3. Chania Kumar alias Chaniya Kumar Son of Binod Singh

4. Amrendra Kumar Alias Budal Kumar Son of Rajesh Kumar Singh alias Rajesh Singh.

5. Prince Kumar Son of Rajendra Singh. All Petitioners are resident of VillageChhapra, Ganpat Toal, P.S. Akorhigola, District- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Atul Chandra For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 24-01-2019 Heard the parties.

By way of this memo of appeal, preferred under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, appellants seek for setting aside the order dated 3.12.2018 passed in Registered case no.252 of 2018 arising out of SC/ST P.S.62 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x)(s) of SC/ST Act by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Ist, Rohtas at Sasaram whereby and where-under, the appellant's application for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected. Allegation against the appellants is of abusing the informant by caste name and also assaulting him and alleging that the informant is instrumental in lodging of the case against the appellants.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.60 of 2019 dt.24-01-2019 2/2 Submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is that they were earlier granted police bail and they have not misused the same. The allegation is false and concocted. There is case and counter case also lodged by the appellants.

Heard learned Special P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the appellants surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered on the basis of submissions that they were on police bail and they have not misused the same and shall be disposed of if possible on the same day.

Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of .

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.1.2019 Transmission Date 28.1.2019