Ramesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72024 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2021 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== RAMESH RAI Son of Raja Ram Rai Resident of Village - Chakiya, P.S.- Doriganj, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 93 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant, a minor, alleges that on 01.03.2021 at about 8:00 PM, the informant was at his door and he opposed the petitioner from selling liquor as people after being intoxicated used to make noise on which it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant with slaps and further assaulted him with an iron rod on his head causing injury and other accused persons are alleged to have assaulted by lathi

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72024 of 2021(2) dt.02-08-2022 2/2 and danda.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, allegation of assault is on all the accused persons and petitioner has been roped in the present case since the informant was harbouring grudge against him.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is a specific allegation of assault by this petitioner on head of the informant by an iron road causing grievous injury. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

His prayer for anticipatory bail is thus rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T