Dilip Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22816 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -83 Year- 2016 Thana -BACHWARA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Dilip Rai Son of Damodar Rai, R/o Village- Ranitola, P.S.- Bachhwara, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 83 of 2016 registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai.

Submission is that petitioner, who happens to be husband of the deceased, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that there is direct allegation of torture for non-fulfillment of demand against the husband-petitioner. Hence, he does not deserve anticipatory

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22816 of 2017 (9) dt.23-11-2017 2/2 bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- U T