← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./1145/2019dismissed

Lallan Singh v. Most. Janki Kuer

2022-09-27Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.1145 of 2019 In Miscellaneous Appeal No.948 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Gopalganj ====================================================== LALLAN SINGH Son of Late Munsi Singh Resident of Village- Sirsa, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

MOST. JANKI KUER Widow of Late Munsi Singh Resident of Village- Post Dighwa Dubouli, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 No one appears for the petitioner.

It appears on perusal of the impugned judgment that in the learned court below the opposite party-petitioner was examined and he himself deposed that he is ready to pay Rs. 2000/- per month as maintenance to his mother. Taking note of the statement of the petitioner the learned court below has allowed the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 2000/- per month to the applicantmother. On perusal of the revision application, this Court finds no statement at all that any error has been committed by the learned court below in recording the statement of this petitioner wherein he has himself expressed his readiness to pay Rs.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1145 of 2019(7) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 2000/- per month maintenance to his mother.

In the opinion of this Court, this Revision Application is completely misconceived and is nothing but a misuse of the process of court. It is, thus, dismissed.

If the petitioner is not paying the said maintenance amount to his mother the entire arrears as well as current maintenance shall be realized from him with additional sum of Rs. 25000/- which this Court imposes as cost upon him for keeping his mother engaged in litigation since the year 2017. Let the entire amount be recovered through the process of court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.