Wosim Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4216 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -222 Year- 2014 Thana -SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Wosim Ansari Son of Fidrat Ansari Resident of vill-Wahera,P.SMajorganj,Distt.-Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ajameri Khatoon W/O Wosim Ansari Resident of vill-Panchhor,P.SRiga,Distt.-Sitamarhi .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02.02.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner being husband of the complainant apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1/ 222 of 2014 in which cognizance has been taken for the offences under section 498A of the IPC and section 4 of the D.P. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to keep complainant with full honour and dignity.

Without entering into the merit of the case, this anticipatory bail stands disposed of with direction to

petitioner to surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi/ concerned court in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1/ 222 of 2014 within three weeks from the date of receipt /production of a copy of this order and seek regular bail and if petitioner does so, the concerned court shall release the petitioner on provisional bail on the day of his surrender for a period of four months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to his satisfaction.

Furthermore, after being released the petitioner on provisional bail, the concerned court shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as complainant fixing a date for reconciliation and shall take all possible steps to patch up the dispute of the parties and in the above stated attempt, if the concerned court succeeds to patch up the dispute of the parties, the concerned court shall pass order for confirmation of bail of the petitioner but if the concerned court fails due to rigid approach of the petitioner, then, in that event, provisional bail of the petitioner will not be confirmed by the court below and in that event, petitioner shall be taken into custody and his regular bail application shall be decided by the concerned court on its own merit.

It goes without saying that if the aforesaid effort fails on account of rigid and non-cooperative approach of the complainant, the provisional bail of the petitioner shall be confirmed by the court below itself. Shahid ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.) U T