Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41312/2014withdrawn

Kailu Yadav And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-10-09Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41312 of 2014 (3) dt.09-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41312 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -166 Year- 2014 Thana -SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================

1. Kailu Yadav son of Late Nathuni Yadav

2. Kusheshwar Yadav son of Kailu Yadav

3. Rajo Yadav son of Kailu Yadav

4. Devchand Yadav @ Devchandra Yadav son of Late Jibach Yadav

5. Santosh Yadav son of Late Jibach Yadav

6. Mahendra Yadav son of Late Yadu Yadav

7. Arun Yadav son of Late Yadu Yadav

8. Bhola Yadav son of Late Chote Lal Yadav

9. Satyanarayan Yadav son of Late Chote Lal Yadav

10. Ramchandra Yadav son of Late Chote Lal Yadav

11. Damodar Yadav son of Late Puran Yadav

12. Rampravesh Yadav son of Late Puran Yadav

13. Shivjee Yadav son of Late Puran Yadav

14. Dilip Yadav son of Late Puran Yadav

15. Manoj Yadav son of Bhola Yadav

16. Saroj Yadav son of Bhola Yadav

17. Sundir Yadav @ Subindu Yadav son of Bhola Yadav

18. Dinesh Yadav son of Satyanarayan Yadav

19. Sakun Yadav son of Late Nathuni Yadav

20. Bhageshwar Yadav son of Sukan Yadav

21. Shankar Yadav son of Sukkan Yadav

22. Ganesh Yadav son of Sukkan Yadav All are residents of Village - Lilhaul, P.S. - Singhia, District - Samastipur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sheikh Moti son of Late Shiekh Mohammad Jan Resident of Village - Lilhaul, P.S. - Singhia, District - Samastipur. .... .... Opposite Parties ==================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh(APP) ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41312 of 2014 (3) dt.09-10-2017 3.

09-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to raise all such pleas which are available to the petitioners at an appropriate stage in the court below. Liberty is granted.

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U T