← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1454/2019bail granted

Narayan Paswan @ Narain Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-18Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1454 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2018 Thana- BARHARA KOTHI District- Purnia ====================================================== Narayan Paswan @ Narain Paswan, son of Late Madho Paswan, Resident of village Jai Nagar Shiswa Tola, P.S. Barhara, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Anil Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 14 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant who is mother of the deceased has alleged that petitioner along with F.I.R. named accused persons killed her daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. Petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1454 of 2019(2) dt.18-01-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 14 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T