Raj Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72365 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2022 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

RAJ KUMAR RAM Son of Chandkishore Ram Resident of Village- Pirauta, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur 2.

ROHIT RAM Son of Chandrabhan Ram Resident of Village- Pirauta, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur 3.

CHANDAN KUMAR @ CHANDAN KUMAR RAM Son of Chandrabhan Ram Resident of Village- Pirauta, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur 4.

ITWARU RAM @ KARAN KUMAR RAM @ KARAN RAM @ ETWARI RAM Son of Radha Kishun Ram Resident of Village- Pirauta, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur 5.

SANTOSH RAM Son of Suraj Ram Resident of Village- Pirauta, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307, 379, 354 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is commission of assault against petitioners No. 1 to 4 whereas allegation against petitioner No.5 is of snatching golden chain from the daughter of informant. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72365 of 2022(3) dt.11-05-2023 2/2 that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. It is further submitted that due to dispute over pathway a quarrel took place between both sides in which injured persons sustained simple injuries. Petitioners have got clean antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateVII, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Ara Muffasil PS case No. 101/ 2022, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T