Ramu Kumar Yadav @ Ramu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 60571 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- SATHI District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Ramu Kumar Yadav @ Ramu Yadav S/o Sipahi Yadav @ Sipahee Yadav R/o Khajuria, PS- Sathi, District- West Champaran 2.
Sipahi Yadav @ Sipahee Yadav S/o Late Babu Lal Yadav R/o Khajuria, PSSathi, District- West Champaran 3.
Nandlal Yadav @ Nand Yadav S/o Late Babu Lal Yadav R/o Khajuria, PSSathi, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Sathi P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 dated 17.03.2025, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 191(3), 191(2), 190, 117, 118(1), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, when the informant was sitting at his door then the petitioners along with other accused persons armed with weapons came and started abusing. When informant objected then Narsingh Yadav ordered
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 60571 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 to kill him then the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners started assaulting the informant and his family members. Nand Yadav (petitioner no. 3) and Sipahi Yadav (petitioner no. 2) is said to have assaulted Amar Yadav (father of the informant) by means of lathi.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that both the sides are agnates. It is next submitted that the occurrence took place on 21.12.2024 but the Complaint Case was filed on 12.02.2025 i.e. after a delay of 1 month 22 days without any plausible explanation. There is a case and counter case between the parties. Counter case bearing Sathi P.S. Case No. 257 of 2024 was lodged by the mother of co-accused Dadan Yadav namely Umravati Devi against informant's side. Learned counsel further submitted that injury report reveals that Amar Yadav sustained two injuries. Injury no. 1 is simple in nature while injury no. 2 is grievous in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioners have one criminal case each against them.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 60571 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Sathi P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025, they shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Khatim Reza, J) sankalp/- U T