Ranjan Yadav @ Ranju Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.189 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-538 Year-2019 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== RANJAN YADAV @ RANJU YADAV Son of Nityanand Yadav Resident of Village - Madhura Uttar, Police Station - Narpatganj, District - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and has antecedent of six cases. The informant alleges that two unknown culprits intercepted him and looted his mobile and cash Rs. 4,50,000/- which he had withdrawn from S.B.I. for distributing to the customers, it is next alleged that the accused persons fled after firing, it is also alleged that the informant could identify the accused persons if he sees them.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.189 of 2022(2) dt.13-05-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was against unknown and the name of this petitioner came in his own confessional statement while he was arrested in Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 824 of 2021. It is submitted that confession made in police custody does not have any evidentiary value where the police made the petitioner to confess his participation in the present occurrence. It is submitted that despite the petitioner being in custody was never put on TIP nor any incriminating articles relating to the loot in the present case was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and his name came in his own confessional statement, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 538 of 2019 with a condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.189 of 2022(2) dt.13-05-2022 3/3 father, Nityanand Yadav.
Further, if the learned court below comes to a conclusion that after release, the petitioner is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned court below shall forthwith cancel his bail bonds after recording reasons. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T