Parash Nath Mahto @ Paras Nath Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1691 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1137 Year-2018 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Parash Nath Mahto @ Paras Nath Mahto Late Ram Niwaj Mahto @ Ram Niwash Mahto Resident of Village- Itwan, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 1137 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant is the Chaukidar, who in his written complaint has stated that accused Bhutali Mochi killed his daughter Chano Kumari. Allegation against petitioner is that he helped the main accused in concealing the dead body. Petitioner is the accused in one another case as stated in para 3 of the petition and he is in custody since 13.10.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1691 of 2019(2) dt.21-01-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Danapur, DistrictPatna, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 1137 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T