Govind Kumar Singh @ Govind Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64130 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2025 Thana- ITARHI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Govind Kumar Singh @ Govind Chaudhary S/O Late Devpujan Chaudhary Resident of Village- Kukurha, P.S- Itarhi, Distt.- Buxar. 2.

Shivaji Chaudhary @ Sipahi Choudhary @ Shivji Chaudhary S/O Late Devpujan Chaudhary R/O Village- Kukurha, P.S- Itarhi, Distt.- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners in this application pray for bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case no.125 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 117(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that over a trivial dispute relating to irrigation of agricultural land, the four named accused persons including the two petitioners herein came variously armed and assaulted the informant and his son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64130 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case because of a trivial dispute over irrigation of agricultural land as would be evident from the contents of the FIR itself. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. The manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the FIR. It is further submitted that the injury as a result of the allegation of assault attributed to the petitioner no.2 has been found to be simple in nature while that on petitioner no.1 though grievous in nature is on the right shoulder of the son of the informant. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioners in the FIR, the cause of dispute giving rise to the occurrence, the contents of the injury report dealt with in the order of the learned Court below and the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that both the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case no.125 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64130 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T