Vikash Kumar Ram @ Rajan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.80728 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-463 Year-2018 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Ram @ Rajan Ram Son of Bhuneshwar Ram Resident of Village - Sugao Dih Dhangar Toli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 463/2018, instituted for offence under Section(s) 25(1-b)a and 26 of Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has already filed supplementary affidavit stating therein that two more cases are pending against this petitioner. One loaded country made pistol is alleged to have been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 03.09.2018.

Keeping in view the period of custody already spent by the petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80728 of 2018(2) dt.17-01-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 463/2018, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T