Santosh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64663 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2024 Thana- CHAND District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Santosh Singh Son of Late Ramjee Singh R/v-Sihoriyan, p.s- chand, Distt. -Kaimur (Bhabua) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-11-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chand P.S. Case No.119 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per the FIR, the allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant by means of deadly weapon due to which he sustained injury. The accused persons also took away Rs.50,000/- from the informant.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. It is alleged that petitioner has no concern with the informant. He is only a co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64663 of 2024(3) dt.21-11-2024 2/2 villager who resides far away from the place of occurrence. Petitioner has three criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that from bare perusal of the case diary, it appears that two injuries of the injured is grievous in nature.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. 7.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T