Sukhdev Singh @ Negar Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23344 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2016 Thana -ANGARGHAT District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================
1. Sukhdev Singh @ Negar Singh S/o Late Maniki Singh
2. Sakina Khatoon W/o Ishrafil Both 1 & 2 R/of Village Rampur Samathu, P.S. Angarghat, Distt - Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 13-06-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Angarghat P.S. Case No. 55 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 447, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioners along with other accused persons came at the door of the informant with deadly weapons and they started abusing him and on the protest by the informant, the petitioner no.1- Sukhdev Singh @ Negar Singh had given order to kill the informant, thereafter other accused persons caused injury on the head, neck and hand of the informant by sword. So far as the petitioner no.2 is concerned, it has been alleged that she had spread chilly powder on the informant and others.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23344 of 2017 (2) dt.13-06-2017 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present matter relates to a case and counter case and so far as the informant of the present case is concerned, he is accused in Angarghat P.S.Case No. 56 of 2016, lodged by one of the accused persons of the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. The learned counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that the injuries suffered by the informant and others are not serious in nature. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and particularly the fact that the instant case pertains to a case and counter case, I find that the instant case is fit for grant of anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbonds of Rs. 20,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur, in connection with Angarghat P.S. Case No. 55 of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U T