Munna Sao v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2144 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2012 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ====================================================== Munna Sao Son of Late Nageshwar Sao resident of village - Rupabel, P.S. Khaira, District - Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt.Sucheta Yadav(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No. 180 of 2015 arising out of Jamui P.S. Case No. 49 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 387 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substances Act.
Allegedly, four miscreants on two motorcycles, due to non-fulfillment of demand of ransom, threw bomb upon the informant with an intention to kill him resulting the informant entered into his house and closed the door and again bomb was exploded and out of them co-accused Sharawan Tanti and Anil Tanti were identified. The petitioner is named with allegation that
earlier threats were caused and the caller stated the name as petitioner.
Submission is of false implication and that there is no legal and cogent material against the petitioner. The petitioner name has been taken only on the statement made by the caller, coaccused Sharwan Tanti has already been allowed bail vide Cri. Misc. No. 24044 of 2012 and the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 20.06.2015, deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent and he is involved in thirty cases. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that none of the persons sustained any injury nor any money was delivered and co-accused Shrawan Tanti has already been allowed bail and, as such, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge II, Jamui in connection with S.T. No. 180 of 2015 arising out of Jamui P.S. Case No.
and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T