← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20929/2017rejected

Sukhan Bhagat @ Sukham Bhagat Sukhan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-13Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20929 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2017 Thana -RAGHUNATHPUR District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Sukhan Bhagat @ Sukham Bhagat @ Sukhan Son of Late Ram Narayan Bhagat

2. Ramesh Kushwaha Son of Shri Sukham Bhagat @ Sukhan Bhagat @ Sukhan

3. Umesh Kushwaha Son of Shri Sukham Bhagat @ Sukhan Bhagat @ Sukhan All are Residents of Village- Pipra, Police Station- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No.16 of 2017, registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation in brief is that due to partition dispute, the petitioners started assaulting the informant and his son Rajan Bhagat and petitioner nos.2 and 3 assaulted in the abdomen of the informant with knife and other parts of the body causing bleeding injury as a result of which the informant became unconscious. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20929 of 2017 (2) dt.13-06-2017 2 / 2 sides are agnates and for partition dispute they have been falsely implicated.

The learned APP opposes the prayer of bail and submits that impugned order itself reflects that grievous injury was caused on left and right chest of the informant Lalan Bhagat Having considered the said facts and circumstances, this Court does not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No.16 of 2017 is rejected. (Arun Kumar, J.

S.Kumar/- U T