Sajid Alam @ Sahid Anwar @ Shid Anwar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68793 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-841 Year-2018 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== SAJID ALAM @ SAHID ANWAR @ SHID ANWAR Son of Anurul Haque @ Amirul Haque Resident of Village- Jawkatia, P.S.- Manjhaulia, DistrictWest Champaran, Bettiah ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Kamaluddin, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant in his written complaint has alleged that petitioner demanded money for the treatment of his mother on account of which informant gave his ATM Card and thereafter petitioner allegedly withdrawn Rs. 3,16,700/- from the said ATM Card.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68793 of 2019(2) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 in custody since 02.07.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Bettiah(T) P.S. Case No. 841 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U