← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19836/2014disposed

Nitu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19836 of 2014 ====================================================== Nitu Kumari W/o Vinod Kumar Rajak Resident of Village -Sajanpur, P.OKisanpur,P.S-Varis Nagar, District-Samastipur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Chief Secretary,Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat,Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat ,Patna

4. The District Education Officer, "Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan" District -Samastipur

5. The District Magistrate, Samastipur

6. The Block Education Officer, Varis Nagar ,District-Samastipur.

7. The District Programme Officer "Saksharata" Mission Samastipur,

8. The Block Programme Co-Ordinator Varisnagar,Samastipur

9. The Head Teacher, Utkramit Middle School Sajanpur Dhurlak,Varisnagar,Samastipur

10. The Head Teacher, Utkramit Middle School Maksudpur (Incharge),Varisnagar, Samastipur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumod Kumar Shrivastaw, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manoj Kuamr, AC to GP-4.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-08-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner rand learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The grievance of the petitioner is payment of honorarium.

Learned counsel submits that petitioner was appointed as "Tola Sevak" in Aprial 2012 and thereafter petitioner was working but the honorarium admissible was denied to the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed

Patna High Court CWJC No.19836 of 2014(2) dt.03-08-2018 2/2 of with direction to the District Programme Officer, Saksharata Mission , Samastipur to verify the record whether the petitioner has discharged their responsibility on the post of "Tola Sevak" and he may pass appropriate order with regard to payment of honorarium for the aforesaid period. Final decision as to payment of honorarium of the petitioner be taken by the respondent District Programme Officer, Samastipur within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid the writ petition is disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Rajiv/- U