Shankar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67760 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2023 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Shankar Thakur Son Of Ram Chandra Thakur Resident Of VillageBishanpur Madhaul, Ps- Mahua, Distt- Vaishali 2.
Amarjit Thakur @ Anarjit Thakur Son Of Shankar Thakur Resident Of Village- Bishanpur Madhaul, Ps- Mahua, Distt- Vaishali 3.
Gita Devi Wife Of Anarjit Thakur @ Amarjit Thakur Resident Of VillageBishanpur Madhaul, Ps- Mahua, Distt- Vaishali 4.
Munni Devi Wife Of Amod Thakur Resident Of Village- Bishanpur Madhaul, Ps- Mahua, Distt- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 365, 498(A), 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code later on Section 302 of I.P.C. was added.
3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the petitioners along with other co-accused persons have killed the daughter of the informant. It is further alleged that son of the deceased was also missing.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67760 of 2023(3) dt.24-01-2024 2/2 case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioners are in-laws of the deceased. He further submits that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody, as mentioned in para-14 of this application. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No.225 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T