Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.878 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-654 Year-2021 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH Son of Ganesh Singh Resident of Village- Pokhaira, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 2.
Anshu Kumar @ Anshu Kumar Singh Son of Ganesh Singh Resident of Village- Pokhaira, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 3.
Abhishek Kumar Son of Ganesh Singh Resident of Village- Pokhaira, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 447 of I.P.C.
Allegedly, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons entered the house of the informant and assualted her and her son by means of several weapons due to which they
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.878 of 2022(3) dt.01-08-2022 2/3 sustained several injuries. It is further alleged that the accused persons snatched money and a mobile phone from the informant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and has committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and counter case between the parties and both are agnates. In the alleged occurrence both sides sustained injuries and the injuries are simple in nature which is evident from the impugned order itself. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the injuries are simple in nature, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.878 of 2022(3) dt.01-08-2022 3/3 where the case is pending/Successor Court in Vaishali P.S. Case No. 654 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T