Patna High CourtCR. MISC./686/2022withdrawn

Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-04Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.686 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2016 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== BIPIN KUMAR Son of Vijay Mehta @ Bishundeo Mehta Resident of Village- Latraha, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhouri Vipin Bihari Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant (B.D.O.) alleges that a ransom of Rs. 1 lakh was demanded from him from mobile no. as detailed in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said mobile number is in the name of one Lalita Devi which was being used by her son and as such petitioner is not the owner of the mobile and he came to be implicated in the present case on account of dirty village politics but the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.686 of 2022(2) dt.04-08-2022 2/2 petitioner is not able to substantiate that as to what was the dirty village politics based on which he came to be implicated. Learned counsel further submits that even presuming what has been alleged in the F.I.R. is true without admitting for the purposes of anticipatory bail then no ransom was paid. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing vehemently, seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application.

Permission is accorded.

In the event, if the petitioner surrenders in the learned Trial Court on or before 25.08.2022, then the bail application of the petitioner shall be disposed of on the same day keeping in mind the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and no ransom was paid.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T